Links und Literatur

Unsere Publikationen: https://journal.medicine.berlinexchange.de -

Palayew, A., Norgaard, O., Safreed-Harmon, K. et al. Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nat Hum Behav 4, 666–669 (2020).
Kurth, T., Piccininni, M., Loder, E. W., & Rohmann, J. L. (2020). Parallel pandemic: The crush of covid-19 publications tests the capacity of scientific publishing. BMJ, 0.

Dirnagl, U. Der Peer Review ist tot, lang lebe der Peer Review! Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren (32) LJ_20_10
Tennant JP, Ross-Hellauer T. The limitations to our understanding of peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Apr 30;5:6
Cole, S., Cole, J. R., & Simon, G. A. (1981). Chance and consensus in peer review. Science, 214(4523), 881-886.
Severin A & Chataway J. Overburdening of peer Reviewers: A multi-stakeholder perspective on causes and effects. Learned Publishing. 2021

Dirnagl, U. Preprints – Heilsbringer oder apokalyptische Reiter des wissenschaftlichen Publizierens? Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren (43) LJ 21 12
Dirnagl, U. Registered reports: Was wir von Columbus lernen könnten. Einsichten eines Wissenschaftsnarren (28) LJ_20_4
Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, Polka JK, Pálfy M, et al. (2021). The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLOS Biology 19(4): e3000959.
Brierley L, Nanni F, Polka JK, Dey G, Pálfy M, et al. (2022) Tracking changes between preprint posting and journal publication during a pandemic. PLOS Biology 20(2): e3001285.
Mandavilli, A. Peer review: Trial by Twitter. Nature 469, 286–287 (2011).